Journal editor defends pro-infanticide piece

LifeSiteNews: The editor of an ethics journal that recently published an article advocating infanticide (what the authors call “post-birth abortion”), has responded to widespread criticism by pointing out that promoting the killing of newborns is nothing new: in fact, in the Netherlands infant euthanasia is already legal and practiced.

Editor Julian Savulescu also criticizes what he calls the “hate speech” directed at the authors of the article, arguing that the public’s response to the piece shows that “proper academic discussion and freedom are under threat from fanatics opposed to the very values of a liberal society.”

In the journal article Alberto Giubilin, a philosopher from the University of Milan, and Francesca Minerva, an ethicist from the University of Melbourne, made the case that “after-birth abortion” should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is perfectly healthy. They base their argument on the premise that the unborn baby and the newborn do not have the moral status of actual persons and are consequently “morally irrelevant.”

Editor: I agree with Savulescu that abusive language is not helpful, but for a idfferent reason. It betrays our cause. "Academic freedom" aside, we can come up with arguments opposing infanticide, can't we? We don't need to resort to name-calling.  In fact, the Bible says "hate speech" is as destructive as murder (see Matthew 5:19-22 and James 3:8-10).